Hebrew University’s Botanical Garden: a Source in Scientific Knowledge Creation in Mandatory Palestine

Authors

  • Mona Bieling The Graduate Institute, Geneva Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24847/v9i22022.338

Keywords:

Mandatory Palestine, Zionism, Botany, Mobility, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Frontier Making

Abstract

This primary source commentary analyzes a letter (dated 28 July 1929) sent by Alexander Eig, botanist and custodian of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s herbarium, to Judah Magnes, chancellor and later first president of Hebrew University. This letter, which discusses the creation of a botanical garden connected to the university, shows how the emerging Jewish community of botanists at the newly established Hebrew University was carving out space for itself in the international community of botanical experts. Moreover, the letter exemplifies the importance of people’s mobility in creating botanical knowledge, as well as the movement of plants, seeds, and other specimens, and highlights interaction between scientific institutions as an important aspect of nation-building. Mandatory Palestine’s position as the “Holy Land,” as well as its location across Middle Eastern and Mediterranean environmental spaces, made Jerusalem a unique and attractive center for botanical knowledge creation, as was recognized early on by the Jewish botanists in question.

Author Biography

  • Mona Bieling, The Graduate Institute, Geneva

    Mona Bieling is an advanced PhD student and teaching assistant in the Department of International History and Politics at the Geneva Graduate Institute, Switzerland. Her research interests lie at the nexus of environmental, global, and colonial history. More specifically, she explores how landscape changes under the British Mandate for Palestine influenced the power relations between the Mandate Government, the Zionist movement, and the local Arab Palestinian population. Previously, Mona worked as a research assistant for the SNF-funded project “The Myth of Homogeneity. Minority Protection and Assimilation in Western Europe, 1919–1939.” Email: mona.bieling@graduateinstitute.ch

References

Baber, Zaheer. “The Plants of Empire: Botanic Gardens, Colonial Power and Botanical Knowledge.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46, no. 4 (2016): 659–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1185796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1185796

Beinart, William and Lotte Hughes. Environment and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199260317.001.0001

Brockway, Lucile. Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens. New York: Academic Press, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1979.6.3.02a00030

Drayton, Richard. Nature’s Government. Science, Imperial Britain, and the “Improvement” of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.

Leimkugel, Frank. “Botanischer Zionismus: Otto Warburg (1859–1938) und die Anfänge institutionalisierter Naturwissenschaften in ‘Erez Israel.’” Englera 26 (2005): 128–52.

Osborne, Michael A. “Acclimatizing the World: A History of the Paradigmatic Colonial Science.” In Nature and Empire: Science and the Colonial Enterprise, edited by Roy MacLeod, Osiris 15 (2000): 135–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/649323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/649323

“Prof. Alexander Eig.” The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Science. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem website. Last modified May 2022. https://www.bio.huji.ac.il/en/content/eig-alexander.

Schiebinger, Londa and Claudia Swan. Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-05

Issue

Section

Roundtable